
GIREP Seminar
2003
|

Studies on the links between the science education research and teacher
training have chiefly sought to integrate into training projects
the results of research concerning students’ conceptions, pedagogical
methods and content analysis, to define curricula and competences
and to study the teachers’ conceptions about science or teaching
and learning.
Research has shown that student-teachers have their own conceptions and
beliefs on teaching and learning, very often based on quite simplistic
and conservative models considering teaching as transmission and learning
as absorption. This leads teachers to adopt methods based on lectures
and experimental demonstrations, removed from the proposals of research
in education, stressing the need for an active construction of knowledge
by students.
This paper proposes to introduce a direct use of research publications
as documents to analyse and discuss with students teachers. It argues
this choice and describes one such experiment conducted at the University
of Udine. It also stresses the importance of training teachers using
didactic model similar to those recommended for use in schools.
It is a matter of accustoming student teachers to gain a new perspective,
to view teaching practice “differently” and to help them
to develop a more scientific approach to teaching-learning phenomena
(e.g. formulating hypotheses about pedagogical activities and evaluating
their actual results). Moreover, the custom of reading and analysing
research papers should be an independent objective in teacher training,
with a view to promote a higher professionalism among teachers.
This practice can also foster a narrowing of the gap between didactic research
and the reality of schools, in a reciprocal movement in the two directions. In
fact, much research seems too far from this reality, so teachers may feel it
is too abstract and not understand the links with problems they have to deal
with every day. Probably, this is due not only to teachers’ difficulties
but also to research, sometimes too confined in its self-referring community.
|